Multiply
← All causes
Gospel mediaMinistry figures only

FEBC

Legal name: Far East Broadcasting Company · EIN 95-1461574

FEBC has broadcast Christian radio into Asia since 1945. The US office does three things: it produces programming in its own studios in Mandarin, Tagalog, Hmong, Korean and Vietnamese; it provides leadership, training and IT to 19 affiliate offices; and it sends grants to broadcasting stations in other countries that its own Form 990 says are not under its control. Its Schedule F reports zero offices and four agents outside the United States — the stations themselves are separate national organisations.

Cambodia · China · India · Indonesia · Japan · Kazakhstan · Kyrgyzstan · Mongolia · Myanmar · Pakistan · Philippines · Russia · South Korea · Thailand · Ukraine · Vietnam

We read the ministry’s own pages and accreditations. We have not found published numbers we can divide, so no cost per outcome is shown.

We cannot tell you what $500 buys here

FEBC has not published a spending figure and an outcome count that can be divided into each other. Any number we printed would be invented, so there is none. The specific documents we looked for are listed further down.

What the ministry advertises

  • “Last year we received 150 million listener engagements to the Gospel.”

    Impact

  • “FEBC broadcasts are heard in 152 languages and in 50 countries around the world aired from 260 stations and transmitters, totaling 1,571 hours of programming a day/365 days a year.”

    Impact

  • “Over 82% of funds donated to FEBC go directly to sharing the Gospel in hard-to-reach places.”

    Financial Accountability

Why this is the church’s work

The commission is to go into all the world and preach, and the argument in Romans is that hearing has to come first — someone has to be sent, and the message has to arrive. Radio arrives in places a person cannot be sent to. That is the whole case for this kind of work, and it is a strong one.

  • “Go into all the world and proclaim the gospel to the whole creation.”

    Mark 16:15

  • “How then will they call on him in whom they have not believed? And how are they to believe in him of whom they have never heard? And how are they to hear without someone preaching?”

    Romans 10:14

  • “Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you.”

    Matthew 28:19–20

Doctrinal position we read: Statement of Faith — Our Mission, Vision and Statement of Faith

Our reservations

  • Fifty-six per cent of program spending — $8,204,680 of $14,643,421 — leaves as grants to stations the audit says are “not under the direct control of the U.S. office”. Their books are not in this audit and are not published anywhere we could find. FEBC does publish what each country received, which is more than most grant-makers do, but a donor is funding organisations whose accounts nobody outside them has seen.
  • FEBC names its grants to Russia, Ukraine, China, Pakistan and Myanmar in a public filing, down to the dollar. That transparency is good for a donor and it is a live exposure for the people receiving the money — Russia’s foreign-agent law and China’s restrictions on foreign religious funding both turn a published grant into evidence. We have no way to know whether the local offices would prefer less disclosure.
  • “Listener engagements” is FEBC’s headline number and it is defined nowhere. Radio has no way to count listeners; whatever is being counted here is something else, and until FEBC says what, the figure cannot be used for anything.

A judgement about the work, not a measurement of its results. We do not score souls.

Why a dollar goes further here

Income per person in Myanmar is about 67× below the United States.

The US office keeps no overseas staff at all — Schedule F reports zero foreign offices and four agents — so almost everything it sends abroad is spent as a local wage by a local organisation in an economy far below the donor’s. Myanmar’s income per person is about 67 times below the United States. The 260 transmitters and stations already exist, so a gift buys airtime and programming rather than infrastructure. Broadcast also has the property that one transmission costs the same whether ten people or ten thousand are listening, which is the real economic lever here — and it is exactly the property that produces fraction-of-a-cent claims elsewhere in this sector. We are naming it as a mechanism, not pricing anything with it.

What creates the leverage

  • Local workers, not sent staff — The work is done by believers who already live there. No relocation, no expatriate salary, no home-country cost of living to cover.
  • Low local cost base — Wages, rent, fuel and materials are priced to the local economy, so the same work costs a fraction of what it costs in a high-income country.
  • Rides an existing network — Delivery runs through churches, schools or clinics that already exist and are already staffed, so the gift is not paying to build the channel.
  • Costs almost nothing to copy — Once made, each additional copy or viewing costs close to nothing, so cost per person falls as reach grows.

The cost base, country by country

CountryIncome per personBelow United States
Myanmar$1,32067×
Pakistan$1,50059×
Cambodia$2,75032×
India$2,76032×
Kyrgyzstan$2,80032×
Philippines$4,85018×
Vietnam$4,97018×
Indonesia$5,12017×
Ukraine$5,51016×
Mongolia$6,21014×
Thailand$7,69012×
Kazakhstan$13,7406.5×
China$14,2306.2×
Russia$15,9605.6×
South Korea$37,8802.3×
Japan$38,3402.3×

GNI per capita, Atlas method, current US dollars · World Bank · read 2026-09-19

This is a cost-of-living ratio, not a measure of how well the ministry spends. It tells you what a local wage or a bag of cement costs, and nothing about whether the work is any good — the rest of this page is for that.

Desk review

8 of 15

Gospel centrality
A full evangelical statement of faith is published, the mission statement is about the gospel and nothing else, and the ministry’s stated commitment is to “meeting the spiritual needs of our listeners”. There is no ambiguity about what this organisation is for.
Is the gospel named and central, rather than implied by the ministry’s history?
Local leadership
The broadcasting is done by 19 nationally run affiliate offices, and the audit’s country-by-country grant table shows the money genuinely going to them. Marked down because governance, fundraising and the largest single production budget stay in Frisco, Texas, and the US office describes its own role as providing “leadership, consulting services and training” to the affiliates.
Is the work led and staffed by believers from the place it serves?
Financial transparency
Audited statements and the Form 990 are both posted on the site, the audit breaks grants down by country, and Schedule F shows the foreign structure honestly. Held at 2 because the two documents covering the same fiscal year disagree on program services by $88,950, and because the majority of program spending goes to entities whose own accounts are not published.
Can an outsider find audited statements, a Form 990, and accreditation?
Evidence of outcomes
Stations, languages, countries and broadcast hours are all counted, but those are inputs. The only thing offered as a result is “150 million listener engagements”, which is undated and undefined. No responses, letters, calls or app messages are published.
Does the ministry publish counts of what was delivered, defined clearly enough to check?
Cost per outcome is computable
There is no denominator here that can honestly be divided into the spending. We looked, and the absence is the finding.
Are both a spending figure and an outcome count published, so cost per outcome can be divided out?

What we have not verified

  • What a “listener engagement” is. FEBC publishes 150 million of them as its headline result and never defines the unit, dates the year, or says whether one person can generate several. We did not build a cost per outcome on it, and would not until it is defined.
  • Whether the affiliate-support line can be divided by the 19 offices. It is the one place in these documents where a spending figure and a count of something FEBC itself delivered sit in the same sentence — Part III 4c reports $2,074,052 of expenses and reads “THE U.S. OFFICE PROVIDES LEADERSHIP, CONSULTING SERVICES AND TRAINING TO 19 AFFILIATE OFFICES, INCLUDING STUDIOS, OFFICE SPACE, COMMUNICATION SERVICES AND IT SUPPORT.” We checked it and rejected it, because the same line continues “THE U.S. OFFICE ALSO ADMINISTERS PLANNED GIVING PROGRAMS INCLUDING CHARITABLE GIFT ANNUITIES, CHARITABLE TRUSTS, WILLS AND BEQUESTS, ETC.” Fundraising administration is inside that $2,074,052 and nothing anywhere says how much, so a cost per affiliate office would have a donor-acquisition cost buried in it.
  • Whether FEBC publishes an annual or impact report containing a year’s delivered counts. It does not. We tried ten paths on febc.org — /annual-report/, /annual-reports/, /about/annual-report/, /about/annual-reports/, /impact-report/, /reports/, /financials/, /about/financials/, /accountability/ and /stewardship/ — and every one returned 404. The only accountability page that exists is /about/financial-accountability/, which holds two seals, two percentages and links to the audit and the Form 990. Between them those two documents count stations, languages, transmitters, daily hours and dollars, and not one listener response, letter, call, message or broadcast hour actually aired.
  • What happens to $8,204,680 of grants. The audit lists the amount per country — Vietnam $2,191,750, Thailand $1,155,151, Russia and Ukraine $1,090,000 and so on — but the receiving organisations publish nothing, and FEBC does not say who audits them.
  • Why the audit and the Form 990 disagree. Both cover the year ended 30 June 2025. The audit reports $14,643,421 of program services and $17,671,560 of total expenses; the 990 reports $14,554,471 and $17,700,563. Neither document explains the $88,950 gap on program spending.
  • Whether the 152 languages, 50 countries, 260 stations and 1,571 daily hours are current figures. They appear on the impact page with no year attached.
  • What the stations actually broadcast, and to whom. FEBC has no offices overseas and four agents in total, so nobody the donor is funding is auditing programme content on the ground in a way that is published.
  • Whether the 19 affiliate offices are safe to name. FEBC publishes grant amounts by country for places where foreign religious funding is legally hazardous. We cannot tell from outside whether the local offices consented to that level of disclosure.
  • Whether the “Over 82%” claim is about donations or about all expenses. The audit supports it as a share of total expenses (82.9% program, 7.1% administration, 10.1% fundraising); the site phrases it as a share of “funds donated”, which is a different denominator.

Accreditation seen

  • ECFA accredited
  • Charity Navigator 4-star

Displayed by the ministry on its own pages. We have not re-checked each seal with the accrediting body.

Worth knowing

  • We deliberately did not build a cost per outcome. The arithmetic was available — 1,571 hours of programming a day over 365 days is 573,415 broadcast hours, and $14,643,421 of program spending divided by that is about $26 an hour — but the hours figure is undated, most of those hours are aired by stations FEBC only part-funds, and pairing an undated marketing statistic with an audited figure would produce a number that looks checked and is not.
  • The “2024 Form 990” on FEBC’s site covers the tax year beginning 1 July 2024 and ending 30 June 2025. A donor comparing it to a calendar-year charity is a year out.
  • FY2025 looks stronger than the operations were. A $7,093,146 gain on the sale of real estate in La Mirada, California sits in the year’s results and is not recurring revenue.
  • Program spending is split three ways in the 990: $8,204,680 of grants to affiliates, $3,847,676 of programme production in the US studios, and $2,074,052 of leadership, training and IT for the affiliate offices.

Sources

  • Homepage

    Ministry website · FEBC · read 2026-09-18

  • Our Mission, Vision and Statement of Faith

    Ministry website · FEBC · read 2026-09-18

    Carries the full statement of faith, the mission statement, and FEBC’s “Commitment to Ministry”.

  • Impact

    Ministry website · FEBC · read 2026-09-18

    Source of the 150 million “listener engagements” claim and the 152 languages / 50 countries / 260 stations / 1,571 hours figures. None of them is dated.

  • Financial Accountability

    Ministry website · FEBC · read 2026-09-18

    Displays the ECFA accredited seal and a Charity Navigator 4-star badge, states 8% administration and 10% fundraising, and links the audit and the Form 990.

  • Audited financial statements, years ended 30 June 2025 and 2024

    Audited financial statements · FEBC · 2025 · read 2026-09-18

    Broadcast operations $14,643,421 of $17,671,560 total expenses. Note 11 lists grants to affiliates by country, totalling $8,204,680, and states the stations are not under the direct control of the US office.

  • Form 990 for the tax year 1 July 2024 to 30 June 2025

    IRS Form 990 · FEBC · 2025 · read 2026-09-18

    Part III splits program spending into grants ($8,204,680), US studio production ($3,847,676) and support to 19 affiliate offices ($2,074,052). Part IX line 25 reports $14,554,471 of program services. Schedule F reports zero foreign offices and four agents.